This story is a little old; I had not researched this before: I think this sheds light on the fact that Obama does not recognize that radical Islam exists or cannot be negotiated with. Comments?
I believe this story is a more damning exposure of Obama's true motives than those involving Reverend Wright, Bill Ayers, an attempt to disable the USA economy with 1.5 trillion added debt in a single year, or anything else. Since it occurred in 2006, I CAN'T BELIEVE that it was not revealed in the 2008 elections. Certainly both the Hillary Clinton and John McCain campaigns knew about this. Did they avoid making it an issue because they don't really have genuine convictions themselves against such an incomprehensibly immense destruction of Western civilization?
I agree Bob! I agree! I remember seeing this during the 2008 election and I believe I even posted about Odinga here - I forwarded a lot of stuff about Odinga and Obama long before the election.
I remember that. At the time I felt that no matter how much objective evidence was compiled against Obama, very few would listen at all. But I believed then and have never changed in my conviction that he is probably the most dangerous and destructive of all U.S. presidential candidates/presidents and that he KNOWS WHAT HE IS DOING. It is that last point that I don't find affirmation on even in the most conservative media. I also believe and have for several years that the Khalidi connection is the OTHER most important of Obama's loyalties. Yet even the most conservative of media focuses on Wright and Ayers, not Khalidi. http://article.nationalreview.com/37...rew-c-mccarthy Putting it all together, the 'ideal' government for Obama is a 'liberal' style of Islamic Fascist state in which Islam is portrayed as a 'nice religion'. Of course, that little and SO SIMPLE 'HARMLESS' confession termed the 'shahada' would be required for all who enjoy the high tier of government benefits in such a society! This is not contradictory to Marxism either. Glenn Beck recently hosted a special program where he showed that the differences between any form of Fascism and Marxism are superficial: they are cut out of the same totalitarian cloth. It is all simply an argument of WHO should be in charge and WHICH WORKS should be required (much like the arguments of ALL apostate religion!).