View RSS Feed

Robert R. Higby

The Worthless Principle of Pilate

Rate this Entry
0 Trackbacks 7 Comments
by
Robert R. Higby
on 03-21-2010 at 04:56 PM (4578 Views)

And Pilate wrote a title, and put it on the cross. And the writing was JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS. This title then read many of the Jews: for the place where Jesus was crucified was nigh to the city: and it was written in Hebrew, and Greek, and Latin. Then said the chief priests of the Jews to Pilate, Write not, The King of the Jews; but that he said, I am King of the Jews. Pilate answered, What I have written I have written. John 19:19-22

I will get right to the point on this one. We know that Pilate was an enemy of God and the truth as predestined in the counsel of God, in spite of his pathetic 'stand' defending what he wrote on the title above the cross. His approval and implementation of the crucifixion of Christ was the most wicked and rebellious political cave-in in the history of mankind, in spite of the fact that he tried to wash his hands of the event and blame it completely on others.

Enter Bart Stupak. He has claimed that he 'stood on principle' when he caved-in to a government takeover of the health care industry. He has tried to completely wash his hands of responsibility for this outcome (even though he voted for it) and blame it strictly on the President if a promised executive order is not issued and maintained at all times in the future.

First of all, executive orders are not worth the paper they are printed on in terms of future permanency. We all know that. But that is not the real issue here. The real revelation is that we now see what congressman Stupak and other supporters of the health care bill wanted all along--the claim of standing on principle to bolster their destructive purposes.

I would illustrate what is happening by thinking of a debate on how to execute perceived enemies of the state who must be killed for political expediency. The debate is on exactly how to administer the lethal poison required to kill such enemies. One side wants to use a mixture of two poisons for this purpose, even though it is not necessary. The use of both poisons is mere grandstanding to bolster public opinion on how dedicated the supporters are to the executions. The other side, however, is opposed to use of one of the poisons (i.e., abortion) since it will make some persons feel that the executions involved 'cruel and unusual punishment'. The poison objected to causes suffering in the execution process while the first is rumored to cause little.

This is the only difference I see in the two sides of this debate--fine details on how to successfully destroy the Republic while placing the blame on others. The real motive is to create a seemingly insolvable economic problem and then promise to fix it with totalitarian government control and abolition of private business.

The health insurance business will now be illegal; it is no more insurance. Somehow these politicians have been deceived into thinking that as long as they oppose murderous abortion, any degree of theft from the third and fourth generations in the future is justified to advance their political power.

Submit "The Worthless Principle of Pilate" to Facebook Submit "The Worthless Principle of Pilate" to Digg Submit "The Worthless Principle of Pilate" to del.icio.us Submit "The Worthless Principle of Pilate" to StumbleUpon Submit "The Worthless Principle of Pilate" to Google

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags
Categories
‎ Uncategorized

Comments

  1. gerhard's Avatar
    1. It would be political suicide for Pres. Obama or any future democratic president associated with this legislation to rescind this executive order.
    2. It would be political suicide for any future pro-life Republican president to rescind Obama's executive order.
    3. The executive order should be in effect for at least seven years unless a future Republican president and congress rescind the entire healthcare bill.
    4. Without the healthcare bill, many women without insurance and with a pre-existing condition (pregnant) would abort their babies rather than face financial ruin.
    5. During the next seven years, many unborn babies will be born who otherwise would have been aborted.
    6. Bart Stupak is no Pilate. He's a hero in my book.
    7. Many congressmen who say they are pro-life are not.
    8. These phoney pro-life congressmen get what wanted all along--the claim of standing on principle to bolster their destructive purposes (i.e., the continued murder of unborn babies).
  2. Robert R. Higby's Avatar
    Gerhard,

    You DO NOT KNOW that this legislation will save any babies in the short term, it is speculation on your part!

    As stated in the blog, I do not equate congressman Stupak with Pilate on the issue of abortion--but on the expanding the ponzi scheme of theft of trillions of dollars for at least 4 generations in the future. For EVERY new dollar borrowed now and in the future, 5 or 10 will ultimately have to be paid back. We are talking theft from people 200 years in the future to fund our 'social justice' gluttony today. No positive outcome can possibly be cited to forgive such burglary. The lake of fire is shared alike by liars, thieves, and murderers.
  3. Brandan Kraft's Avatar
    People like gerhard will be the reason we end up with full blown soviet style communism.
  4. gerhard's Avatar
    OK, I agree the Healthcare Act is a ponzi scheme and I cannot know if fewer babies will be aborted. However, the present federal Healthcare system is also a ponzi scheme. It's mere speculation on our part as to which ponzi scheme would bankrupt the nation sooner.

    I'm not for soviet style communism. I would prefer a federal healthcare system that is sustainable and based on free market capitalism. Perhaps, when the Republicans take over, they will enact such a system. However, given their past record, I doubt it.

    A lowering of the abortion rate is not mere speculation on my part. It's a fact that countries that do not deny healthcare coverage to women with pre-existing conditions have lower abortion rates.
    Updated 03-23-2010 at 06:16 AM by gerhard
  5. Calvinator's Avatar
    People need to get off this mentality that the government owes them anything. The government does not owe anyone the right to healthcare.

    It is my understanding that executive orders do not trump law and Stupak sold his soul.

    This county is out of money and a country that over tax their citizens will fail and then no one gets healthcare.
  6. Robert R. Higby's Avatar
    The bottom line: some are defending endless and infinite debt on the government 'credit card' even by claiming that such a policy saves lives! We all know the traditional argument from the pro-abortionists that legalized abortion saves an untold number of mothers who would otherwise be killed by unsafe illegal abortion! Both arguments propose that the end justifies an evil means.

    On a somewhat related note: I have been watching the controversies on the issue of legalized abortion in S. America for a long time. The decline of the R.C.C. has not caused many of these countries to change their laws on abortion; hence the fight goes on and on.

    http://www.faxts.com/index.php?optio...ews&Itemid=121

    Worth watching.
  7. Brandan Kraft's Avatar
    Hey, Obama signed the HCR bill today. But he didn't sign Bart STUPID's executive order as promised!

Trackbacks

Total Trackbacks 0
No other blogs currently reference this blog entry
Trackback URL: