Ya know I was looking thru the website of my old church, and came across a teaching that has been so engrained in my thinking. I was just curious as to what others thought about this, what a church does if its healthy or not? In my old church they'd emphasize spiritual maturity.. they'd say what someone would look like who is mature in faith. Someone who is invovled in the church, in a ministry, devoted to the study of Gods Word, prayer, etc. Many church leaders would be seen as mature and others not. It was like rule to live up by.. but in reality I always fell short of. Either because I just did or I held myself to a high standard. Course this would 'cause other issues in my life, of feeling unworthy and such.
However, I think what I see now in the Faith is believers who are humble. Who don't consider themselves more mature than another. But that we are all learning, that God has us each at different areas in our life, and one isn't better than another. Is that right? Obviously we are to grow, and there are some that feed on milk rather than meat. But should this be the focus of a church??
This is what they said on their site:
Profile of a Villager
We are all in process. All of us are on a journey toward spiritual maturity. The "Profile of a Villager" is a summary of characteristics that mark a spiritually mature believer. Our mandate from Scripture is to press on towards these characteristics until we reach maturity in our faith and come to the fullness of Christ (Eph. 4:12-13).
You may want to look through the list and evaluate your own spiritual maturity and then set some goals for how you'd like to grow in the coming year. Maturity is a community endeavor. We are here to serve you and encourage you in your growth. Let us know how we can help.
And a link to the document that they believe determines a mature believer. http://i.b5z.net/i/u/720587/f/ProfileOfAVillager.pdf
Is there such a list that one needs to measure up to?
Thanks,
Mary







Bookmarks